After Diversion for Wöginger: This is What the Coalition Says

Both Foreign Minister Beate Meinl-Reisinger (NEOS) and Finance Minister Markus Marterbauer (SPÖ) refrained from criticizing Wöginger. Meinl-Reisinger did not comment on the court decision but emphasized that the judiciary had sent a clear signal with the investigations. It is not a trivial offense. The government aims for a new style with transparent appointments according to the coalition agreement.

For Coalition, the Wöginger Case is Concluded After Diversion

For Marterbauer, "it is relevant that this was about the appointment of a tax office." Therefore, they now want to "do everything possible" to ensure that appointment commissions must proceed transparently and objectively in the future. ÖVP State Secretary for Finance Barbara Eibinger-Miedl reiterated that Wöginger had taken responsibility and accepted the diversion that was offered to him. "With that, the matter is concluded."

Criticism from Anti-Corruption Experts on Diversion for Wöginger

Criticism of the diversion came on Wednesday from anti-corruption expert Martin Kreutner. Despite clear evidence, the job trading was dismissed as a minor offense. Kreutner warned on the Ö1 "Morgenjournal" of a potential loss of trust in state institutions as a result.

Diversion for Wöginger in Trial on "Job Trading"

Wöginger had to answer in court for "job trading" because he allegedly intervened with the former Secretary General in the Ministry of Finance, Thomas Schmid, for a party friend and ensured that this person became the head of the tax office for Braunau, Ried, and Schärding. A better-qualified competitor was not considered. Now the ÖVP parliamentary group leader must pay a fine of 44,000 euros. Additionally, he must transfer the symbolic amount of 500 euros to the disadvantaged applicant.

(APA/Red)

This article has been automatically translated, read the original article here.